William Perkins on Galatians 2:1-10

CHAP. II.

1 Then 14. yeares after I went vp againe to Ierusalem with Barnabas, and tooke with me Titus also. 2 And I went by reuelation, and communicated with thē of the Gospel, which I preach amōg the Gentiles, but priuately with them that were the chiefe, least by any meanes I should runne, or had runne in vaine.

IN this chapter, Paul proceedes to iustifie and defend, his immediate, & extraordinarie calling. And this whole chapter seemes to depend on the last wordes of the former chapter, against which the Aduersaries of Paul might happily obiect on this manner: Though the Churches of Iudea glorifie God for thee, yet will not the Apostles doe it; because thou teachest otherwise then they teach. To this obiection, Paul makes a double answer, in this chapter. The effect and summe of the first, is this: I went vp to Ierusalem: I conferred with the Apostles there: I had their consent, and approbation. And the answer containes three parts. The first, of Pauls iourney to Ierusalem, in the first verse: the second, of his conference with the Apostles, in the 2. verse: the third, of the approbation which they gaue him, from the 3. v. to the eleuenth.

In his iourney, I consider foure things. The first is, the Manner of his iourneying, in these wordes, I went vp, or, ascended to Ierusalem. And this he speakes, because Ierusalem was placed, and seated vpon a mountaine, and compassed with moūtaines, Psal. 125. or againe, in respect of the dignitie and excellencie of the place: as we in England are said to goe vp to London, from all the parts of the land, because it is the cheife citie.

The second thing to be considered in the iourney is, the time when, in these words, then after fourteene yeares. Here two questions are to be demaunded. The first is, of which of his iourneies must this be vnderstood? (for he made fiue iournies to Ierusalem.) The first, from Arabia: the second, when he and Barnabas were sent by the Church of the Gentiles to carrie almes to Ierusalem: the third, when he went to the Councell at Ierusalem: the fourth, when he went vp for the keeping of his vowe: the last, is mentioned Act. 19. 21. Answ. These words are not spoken of the first, for that was but three yeares after his conuersion: neither can they well be vnderstood of the second, because Paul then was sent by the Church, and therefore he went not by reuelation. And they cannot well be vnderstood of the third: for then Paul would here haue mentioned the Councell of Ierusalem, whereof he was a principall member, specially seeing he hath occasion so to doe, and it serued much for his purpose. The fourth, & fifth iourneys were after a longer time then fourteene yeares. It is likely therefore, that this iourney here mentioned, and described by Paul, is none of the fiue mentioned by Luke, but some other. The second question is, When these fourteene yeares must beginne? Ans. It is vncerten. Some thinke, they must beginne at his conuersion; some three yeares after, when Paul went first to Ierusalem: and either may be a truth. None must here take offēce. For though circumstances of time, and place, beeing things of lesse moment, cannot alwaies be certenly gathered, yet histories for their substance and doctrines pertaining to saluation are plainly set downe. And here we are put in minde, to be content to be ignorant in some things, because the spirit of God hath more darkly expressed them, or againe because we cannot, by reason of our blindnes, gather them.

The third point is, concerning the companions of Paul in this iourney, namely Barnabas, and Titus. And Paul takes them with him, that they might be witnesses to the Iewes of the doctrine he taught among the Gentiles: and againe, to the Gentiles of the consent that was betweene him, and the rest of the Apostles For the law of God is, that euery matter shall be established by the testimonie of two, or three witnesses. Hence we learne, that if a question arise of the doctrine which is deliuered in the publike Ministerie, then the hearers that are able to iudge, must be witnesses, and the triall is to be made by them. Thus saith Christ in the like case, Why aske ye me? aske them that heard me, Ioh. 18. 21. Therefore great care, and circumspection is to be had of things publikely deliuered. Againe, whereas Paul makes Barnabas a Iew, and Titus a Gentile, his companions, we are taught, to imbrace with a brotherly loue, not onely the men of our owne countrey, but also such as be of other nations, specially if they beleeue. For then they are all children of one father, and pertaine all to one familie: and there is no difference of nations now. It is a fault therefore, that men of one nation carrie in their hearts, a generall dislike, and hatred oftentimes of them with whome they deale and conuerse, and that because they are of such, or such countries.

The fourth point is, the cause of his iourney, in these words, and I went by reuelation. Here we are taught, that for the iournies we make, we are to haue some good and sufficient warrant: though not a reuelation, yet a commandement, or that which counteruailes a commandement: as when we trauaile by vertue of our, callings. When Noe had made the Arke, he enters into it at Gods commandement: he abides in it: and when the earth was in part dried, he presumes not to goe out, till the Lord bad him. Here, three sorts of men are to be blamed. Pilgrimes, that trauell to Ierusalem, or other countries in way of merit, or religion. For they haue no warrant. Secondly, trauellers, that goe from countrey to countrey, and out of the precincts of the Church, vpon vaine curiositie, to see fashions. Such when they trauell from their own countries, yet they trauell not from their vices, but rather goe deeper into them, and come home againe, with many bad and corrupt fashions. The last, are beggers, & Rogues, that passe from place to place, that they may'l ue in idlenes, & vpō the sweat of other mens brows.

Thus much of the iourney: now followes the Conference, in these words; and I communicated, &c. Here generally I gather, that Conferences both priuate, and publike, are laudible, and to be maintained; specially, when they tend to the maintenance of vni[illegible: 1 letter]ie, and consent in doctrine. The Papists blame vs Protestants, for condemning Conferences (as they say) and Councells. But they doe vs wrong. Indeede the Councell of Trent we reiect, and condemne. For in it, against all equitie, the Pope was both partie, and iudge. In it there was no libertie to make triall of truth. For nothing was propounded but by the liking and consent of the Pope. Againe, the whole Councell consisted of such as were of the Italian faction, whose faith was pinned on the Popes sleeue. Neuerthelesse, we allow all Christian Councells, lawfully gathered: and we desire there might be a Generall Councell, for the triall of truth, and for the staying of vnsetled minds: these three caueats beeing remembred. One, that the Councell be gathered by Christian Princes, to whom the right of calling a Councell belongs. The other, that the Pope be no iudge, but a partie. The third, that Christ in his word be the iudge, and that the Delegates in the Councell be but as witnesses, determining all things by the written word.

In this conference, we are first to consider the manner of conferring, which was vsed. Paul saith, he communicated with them, that is, he laid downe vnto them, and expounded the Gospel which he preached; and this he did priuatly, that is, with the Apostles, one by one, in plaine and familiar manner, as one friend doth with an other. Therefore for the maintaining of this conference, there was no assembly made, neither was there any disputation held. Onely Paul declares his doctrine, and they giue assent. Hence it appeares, that Paul doth not submit the truth of his doctrine to triall. For he was resolued of it, and he accursed him that taught otherwise: but his intent was to seeke the approbation of the Apostles, that he might stop the mouth of his aduersaries.

The second point is, the matter of the conference, and that is the Gospel which Paul preached. Here the Papist gathereth, that the Church is the iudge, in all questions pertaining to religion, and the word: because it is here the thing that is iudged. I answer, first, that they gather amisse. For Paul doeth not here submit the Gospel which he preached, to the iudgement of the Church of Ierusalem. And it is false, which they teach: for the soueraigne Iudge of all questions, and controuersies in religion, is Christ alone. The power to determine and resolue in cases concerning faith, and good life, is inseperably annexed to his person; and in it are we to rest. The principall voice of the iudge, and the definitiue sentence, is the written word. And the office of the Church, is no more but to gather, declare, testifie, and pronounce this sentence. It is obiected, that when a question is propounded, the scripture cannot speake, nor Christ in the Scripture, but the Church onely: I answer againe, that God ascribes to the written word, a voice, or speech, Rom. 3. 19. and the scripture speakes sufficiently, to the resoluing of any mans, conscience, in all matters pertayning to saluation. Again, they alleadge, that the Church is before the scripture; and therfore it beeing most auncient, must be the Iudge. I answer, that the Church was before the writing of the word, but not before the word which is written. For the church presupposeth faith, and faith presupposeth a word of God. Vpon this our doctrine, they further vpbraid vs, that we wil be tried by nothing, but by the scriptures, euen as the malefactour, that will not be tried by the Quest, but by the euidence. I answer, for the satisfying of our aduersaries, we submit our selues to the triall of the Church and Councels, so be it, the three cautions before remēbred, be duly obserued: specially, that all things be iudged, and tried by the written word, and by reasons gathered thence.

Againe, the Papists hence gather, that the scriptures are to be approoued by the Church. Ans. Thus much we graunt: yet so, as we hold, that the principal approbatiō of the word, (wherby we are mooued to beleeue and obey,) is in the word, & frō the word, and not from the church. For the scripture hath his euidence within itselfe, which is sufficient to make vs beleeue the word to be the word, though the Church should say nothing.

The third point is, concerning the persons, with whome Paul conferred: namely, with them that were the cheife, that is, with them that were in price and account, as Peter, Iames, &c. Here we see, what is the honour and worshippe that is due to excellent men, namely, a pretious and reuerend estimation. Thus the name of Dauid was in price in Israel for his vertues. 1. Sam. 18. last, And thus with the Papists, are we content to honour the Saints. Again, here the Papists gather, that they are hereticks, that after Pauls example, will not go vp to Rome, to Peter, and his successour, to haue their doctrine and religion tried and examined. I answer, first, we are content to be tried by the writings of Peter, Iames, Iohn, Paul, &c. And this is the commandement of God, in doubtfull cases: To the Law and the testimonie. Isai, 8. Secondly, I answer, that we haue a commandement, not to goe vp to Rome at this day, to haue our religion tried. Reuel. 18. Come out of Babylon my people. Thirdly, I answer, that the Bishop of Rome is Peters successour, not in teaching, but in denying Christ. And the learned Papists confesse, that for this succession, they haue but a humane faith, grounded vpon humane historie.

The fourth point is, the Ende of the conference, Least I should runne, that is, least I should preach, or had preached in vaine. These words of Paul, are not simply to be taken. For the Ministerie of man, and euery sermon, brings forth the fruite which God hath appointed. And whether it be vnto the hearers, the sauour of life, or the sauour of death, it is alwaies a sweet sauour vnto God. The words therefore carrie this meaning: Least my preaching should be of lesse vse, and profit: or againe, least I should preach in vaine, in respect of that good which is looked for at the hands of an Apostle. And this Paul speakes, because a rumor went abroad, that his doctrine in many things, was contrarie to the other Apostles. And by this meanes, many were kept from receiuing the Gospell, and the faith of weake beleeuers was quenched. Now then, the ende of the conference was, to stay this false report, that the Ministerie of Paul, might haue passage, and that with greater profit.

Hence the Papists gather, that the doctrine of Paul was vncerten, and vnprofitable, till it was approoued by Peter. I answer, that Paul sought the approbation of his doctrine, at the hands of Peter, and the rest: not because it was vncerten, and vnprofitable; but because it was slaundered: and the slaunder was, that he taught otherwise then Peter did. Nowe to cut off this slander, he vseth meanes to manifest his consent with Peter, and therefore seekes approbation at his hand.

Againe, when Paul saith, Least I should runne in vaine, he giues vs to vnderstand, that the Ministerie of the word, is not a worke of ease, or pleasure, but a labour: nay a continued labour, like to the running in a race. It were therefore to be wished, that ministers of the Gospel, would so labour, and walke in this calling, that they might be able to say with Paul, I haue fought a good fight, I haue finished my course. &c. 2. Tim. 4.

Thirdly, hence it appeares, that all beleeuers should haue a certen knowledge of their faith and religion. The procuring of this, was the thing that Paul aimed at, in this conference with the Apostles at Ierusalem. We must not be as children, carried away with euery winde of doctrine, Eph. 4. 14. Gods word requires faith in vs: and faith presupposeth certen knowledge. The first, and second commandements require, that we knowe God, and his will, distinguish him from false gods, and his worshippe, from false worshippe. Here comes the fault of our times to be considered: most men among vs, doe not knowe their religion, neither can they distinguish it from errour, and false religion. A foule negligence. We take paines to learne trades, and occupations, that we may haue wherewith to preserue this temporall life: what a shame then is it, that we learne not better to know the doctrine of true religion, whereby our soules are to be saued?

Lastly, here we learne, that the office of the Minister is, not onely to teach and preach, but also to studie, and take care, howe by preaching he may doe the most good.

3. But neither yet Titus, which was with me, though he were a Grecian, was compelled to be circumcised.

After the Conference, followes the Approbation, which was giuen to Paul. It stands in foure things. The first, that the Apostles did not compell Titus to be circumcised, v. 3. The second, that they added nothing to his doctrine, v. 6. The third, that they gaue him the hands of fellowship, v. 7. The laste, that at his departure, they required of him nothing, but the giuing of Almes, v. 16.

For the first; the words, And Titus was not compelled to be circumcised, carrie this sense: I, for my part was readie to circumcise Titus, if there had beene a meete occasion: false brethren would haue imposed a necessitie vpon vs: then I and Titus refused: and the Apostles did not vrge me to circumcise him.

Here it may be demanded, howe this text can well stand with Act. 16. v. 3. for there Paul circumciseth Timothie, a Grecian: and here he refuseth to circumcise Titus, though he were a Grecian. I answer thus. Circumcision was at this time, a thing indifferent. From the first institution, to the comming, and specially to the death of Christ, it was a thing commanded, a Sacrament, and a part of Gods worship. Againe, after the planting of the Church of the newe testament, it was vtterly abolished, and a thing in respect of vse, vtterly vnlawfull. In the middle time, that is, while the Gospel was in publishing to the world, and the Church of the newe Testament was yet in founding, it was a ceremonie free, or indifferent. It may be obiected, that the whole Ceremoniall law was abolished in the death of Christ: I answer, it was so: and circumcision was abolished, in respect of faith, and conscience: yet so, as the vse therof was left to the libertie of the people of God for a while. Circumcision at this time was as a corps that is dead, yet vnburied, and onely laid out; and so it must remaine for a time, that it may be buried with honour. It may againe be obiected, that baptisme was come in the roome of circumcision: and that therefore circumcision was but an idle and emptie ceremonie. I answer, it was not vsed as a Sacrament at this time, or as a part of Gods worship, or as a matter of necessitie, but onely as a free ceremonie, and that onely then, when it tended to the edification of men.

Beeing then a thing indifferent, it might as occasion serued be vsed, or not vsed. Therefore Paul condescending to the weaknes of the beleeuing Iewes, circumcised Timothie: and that he might not offend the godly, and hinder Christian libertie, he refused to circumcise Titus.

Here a great question is answered, whether we may vse things indifferent, as oft as we will, and howe we will? The answer is, No. Things are not called indifferent, because we may vse them indifferently, or not vse them when we will, and how we will: but because in themselues, or in their owne nature, they are neither good nor euill, and we may vse them well, or ill, & we may againe not vse them well, or euill. Furthermore, there be two things which restraine the vse of things indifferent: the lawe of charitie, and the lawes of men. The lawe of charitie is this, Things indifferent in the case of scandall, cease to be indifferent, and are as things morall, that is, either forbidden, or commanded. Paul saith, if to eate flesh, be to the offence of his brother, he will eate no flesh while the world stands, 1. Cor. 8. 13. And though he circumcised Timothie, yet would he not circumcise Titus, least he should offend the godly, and by his example, hurt Christian libertie.

Likewise, the good lawes of men, whether ciuill or Ecclesiasticall, tending to the common good, and seruing for edification, restraine the vse of things indifferent, so that they which shall doe otherwise, then these lawes command, with a contemptuous, or disloyall minde, are guiltie before God; yet here two cautions must be remembred. One, that the lawes of men doe not chaunge the nature of things indifferent: for it is the propertie of God, by willing this or that, to make it good, or euill. Neither doe they take away the vse of things indifferent. For libertie graunted by a soueraigne power, cannot be reuersed by an inferiour power. Therefore humane lawes doe no more, but temper, and moderate, the ouer common vse of things indifferent. The second caution is, That when the ende of a law ceaseth, when there is no contempt of the authoritie that made the law, when no offence is giuen: a thing indifferent remaines in his free vse without sinne, or breach of conscience.

Againe, here we learne, that a thing indifferent, when it is made necessarie to saluation, (as Circumcision was) is not to be vsed. This conclusion serues to ouerthrow the Popish religion. For it stands in the obseruation of things indifferent, as meates, drinkes, apparell, times, &c. And the vsing, or the not vsing of them is made necessarie euen in regard of mans saluation. For the abstinence from things that are by nature indifferent, is made a part of Gods worship, and meritorious of eternall life. For example: to marrie, or not to marrie, is for nature a thing indifferent: and therefore when abstinence from marriage is made necessarie (as it is in diuers orders of men and women) the nature of the thing is changed, which God hath left free, and it is a doctrine of deuills, which is taught.

Here againe we learne, to make difference of persons. Some are weake, some are obstinate. Weake ones are such, as hauing turned vnto God, and carrying in their hearts a purpose in all things to please God, neuerthelesse doe sundrie things amisse, vpon simple ignorance, or badde custome, till they be better informed. Of these Paul saith, that he became all to all, that he might saue some, 1. Cor. 9. 22. and for their sakes he condescended to circumcise Timothie. And if we that haue scarce a drop of mercie in vs, must thus beare with them that are weake, much more will God doe it, who is mercie it selfe. The good shepheard brings home the stray sheepe vpon his shoulders: he carries his lambs in his bosome. Isa. 40. 11. He will not quench the smoaking flaxe, Isa. 42. he spares them that feare him, as a father spares his child. Malach. 3. 17. This beeing alwaies remembred, that weake ones truly turne to God, and carrie in their hearts an honest purpose not to sinne against his lawes at any time wittingly, and willingly. Obstinate persons, are such as professe the faith, and yet hold and practise bad things, of wilfull ignorance, and of malice. These persons are not to be borne with, nor to be respected: and in respect of them, Paul would not circumcise Titus.

Lastly, in that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised, it may be demanded, whether Recusants may be compelled to the exercises of religion? I answer, yea: for exercises of religion are not things indifferent, as Circumcision was. Iosias made a couenant with the Lord, and he caused all his subiects to stand to it, 2. Chron. 34. 32. The king at the marriage feast of his sonne saith of the guests, Compell them to enter in, Luk. 14. 23. It is obiected, that men may not be compelled to beleeue. I answer: it is the commandement of God, prooue the spirits, 1. Ioh. 4. 1. and this commandement pertaines to all persons. Therfore though men may not be compelled to beleeue: yet may they be compelled to come to the congregation, to heare our sermons, and therein the reasons and grounds of our doctrine, that they may trie what is the truth, and cleaue vnto it. For this is their dutie.

4 For all the false brethren, that crept in: who came in priuily to spie out our liberite which we haue in Christ Iesus, that they might bring vs into bondage: 5 To whome we gaue not place by subiection, for an houre that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you.

Paul had said before, that Titus was not compelled to be circumcised: now he addes, For all the false brethren, that is, though the false brethren did what they could to the contrarie. Here then Paul sets downe, who were the cause that Titus was not circumcised, namely, certaine persons at Ierusalem, and them he sets forth by two properties, they are false brethren, and they crept into the Church. Touching the first, by it we learne, that the Church of God vpon earth, euen when it is at the best, hath wicked men, and hypocrites in it. In Adams family, there is Cain: in the Arke, there is Cham: in Christs family, or schoole, there is Iudas. In the Church of Ierusalem, planted and gouerned by the chiefe Apostles, there be false brethren. The true sheepe be often without, and wolues within. Therefore we may not so much as dreame of a perfection of the Church of God vpon earth; so long as wicked men be mixed with true beleeuers.

Againe, these aduersaries of Paul, are called false brethren, because they ioyned Circumcision with Christ, as a necessarie cause of iustification, and saluation. Hence it followes, that the Church of Rome, is a false Church: because it ioynes workes with Christ, in the case of our iustification, and that as meritorious causes.

Their second propertie is, that they crept into the Church, which I conceiue on this manner. The Church of God is as a sheepefold, or house, Ioh. 10. 1. Christ is the onely dore. Now Pastours, that teach Christ aright, are saide to enter in by this dore: they which teach any other way of saluation, are said to clime in an other way: and they which teach Christ, ioyning some other thing with him in the cause of saluation, are said to Creepe in: because in appearance, they maintaine Christ; and yet, because they adde something to Christ, they neither enter nor continue in the true Church, with any good warrant from God. In this, they are like the serpent. Liuing creatures were all placed in Eden: and Man was placed in the garden of Eden called Paradise, and so were not beasts. How then comes the serpent in? why, in all likelihood, it crept in. And so doe false brethren into the Church. Hence I gather that false brethren, are not true, and liuely members of the visible Church: though they be members in appearance. For if they were in their right place, they should not be said to creepe in. The true members of the Church creepe not into the mysticall bodie, but are built and set vpon the foundation by God. It may be alleadged, that they are baptised, and thereby made members of the Church. I answer: that faith makes vs members of Christ, and consequently of the true Church: and baptisme doth but seale our insition into Christ, and serues as a meanes of Admission into the outward societie of the congregation: and the outward washing doth not make any man a member of Christ. Againe, it followes hence, that false brethren are not members of the Catholike church. For the visible church is part of the Catholike: and therefore they which are not reall members of the true visible church, are not members of the Catholike.

Againe, in that false brethren creepe into the congregation, hence it appeares, that no man can set downe the precise time, when errours had their beginning. For the authors thereof enter in secretly, not obserued of men. The enuious man sowes his tares, when men be asleepe, Math. 13. It sufficeth therefore, if we can shew them to be errours by the word, though we cannot designe the set time when they began. The time when a shippe sinketh, we often obserue: but the time when it first drew water, we doe not. Let the Papists thinke vpon this.

Paul, hauing thus declared who were the causes that Titus was not circumcised; goes on, and shewes, how they were causes. The effect, and summe of his declaration, is this: They vrged the obseruation of the Ceremoniall law, as necessarie: and hereupon we resused to circumcise Titus. First therefore, Paul sets downe how they vrged circumcision, and that by three degrees. First, they come in priuily. Secondly, they spie out their libertie. Thirdly, they labour to bring them into bondage. Againe, Paul sets downe the manner of their refusall, in three things. We gaue not place for an houre. We gaue not place by subiection. We gaue no place, that the truth of the Gospel might continue with you.

The first degree or steppe in their vrging of circumcision, was, that They came in priuily: that is, they ioyned themselues in fellowship with the Apostles, & in shew pretended the furtherance of the Gospel: & yet indeed meant nothing lesse: though their fraud, & wickednes was not perceiued. Here then the foū dation they lay of all their naughtie dealing, is their dissēbling, which Paul here notes & condemns. On the contrarie, our dutie is, to be indeed that which we professe our selues to be: & to professe no more outwardly, then we are inwardly: and to approue our hearts to god, for that which we professe before mē.

The second steppe or degree is, that they spie out the libertie vvhich Paul, and the rest had by Christ: that is, they conferre with the Apostles, and inquire of them what libertie they haue by Christ, in respect of the Ceremoniall lawe of God: and this they doe, not of a minde desirous to learne, but for aduantage sake. There be two kinds of spying: one lawefull, the other vnlawefull. Lawefull, as when in iust and lawefull warre, we inquire into the counsells and doings of our enemtes. Numb. 13. 1. Vnlawefull, when men prie into any thing, or matter, to finde a fault. Thus hypocrites spie faults in the persons and liues of men; that they may haue somwhat whereby to disgrace them, Math. 7. 4. Thus Atheists prie into the scriptures, that they may confute them. Thus sundrie hearers, come to sermōs, that they may carpe. Thus our enemies, inquire into our religion, that they may finde (as they suppose) exceptions, vntruthes, and contradictions. And in the Church of Ierusalem, false brethren inquire, how farre Christian liberty extends, that they may ouerthrow it. This kind of spying, is a common fault; we must take heede of it, and apply the eie of our minde to a better vse. First, we are to be spies, in respect of our owne sinnes, and corruptions, to spie them out. Lam. 3. 40. Let us search our waies, and inquire, and turne againe to the Lord. Again, we are to plaie the spies, in respect of our spirituall enemies, that we may finde out the temptations of the flesh, the world, and the deuill. Thirdly, we must be as spies, in searching of the Scriptures. Ioh. 5. 39. that we may vnderstand the words of the lawe of God, and find comfort to our soules.

The third and last degree of vrging, is, that the false brethren seeke to bring the Apostles in bondage, that is, to binde them to a necessarie obseruation of the ceremoniall lawe. Here let vs marke the practise, and pollicie of the deuill. Libertie from sinne, death, and the ceremoniall lawe, is the treasure of the Church: and therefore the deuill seekes to ouerthrow it, by holding men in bondage vnder abolished ceremonies. Thus at this day, they of the popish Church, are in bondage vnder an heape of humane traditions, beeing indeede, a yoake farre heauier, then that of the ceremoniall-lawe. Againe, when men professe the name of Christ, the deuill is content with it: and he indeauours with all his might, euery where to hold them vnder the bondage of sinne, and to hold them in his snare at his will. Thus vnder the name of Christianitie, there be swarmes of Atheists, Epicures, Libertines, worldlings, and prophane persons. At this time, according to auncient custome, we celebrate the memoriall of the birth of Christ: and yet no time so full of disorder as this. For the most that professe Christ, take and challenge to themselues, a licentious libertie, to liue and doe as they list: and this kind of libertie, is flat bondage. But they that are seruants of Christ indeed, should take heede of this bondag[illegible: 1 letter]: For beeing free from sinne, they should be seruants of nothing but righteousnesse, Rom. 6. 18. They that be of a corporation, stand for their liberties: what a shame then is it, that men should loue bondage, and neglect the spirituall libertie, which they haue by Christ.

Thus, we see, howe the false brethren vrged circumcision: now let vs come to Pauls refusall. The first point is, that they would not giue place for an houre. It seemes they were requested to vse circumcision but once; but they would not yeeld, so much as once: because their acte would haue tended to the preiudice of Christian liberty, in all places. Here we learne, that we may not vse the least ceremonie that is, in the case of confession; before our aduersaries, that is, when they seeke to oppresse the trueth, by face, or by fraud, and make ceremonies, signes, and tokens, of the confession of any vntrueth. Iulian the Emperour sitting in a chaire of estate, gaue gold to his souldiers, one by one, withal cōmāding to cast of frākincense, so much as a graine into the fire, that lay vpon an heathenish altar, before Theodoret. bist. lib. 4. c. 16. him. Nowe Christ in souldiers refuse to do it: and they which had not refused, afterward recalled their acte, and willingly suffered death.

Againe, here we learne, that we are not to yeeld from the least part of the trueth of the Gospel, that God hath reuealed to vs. This truth is more pretious, then the whole world beside: and heauen and earth shall rather passe, then the least tittle of it shall not be accomplished. The commission of the Apostles, was to teach them, to doe all things, which God had commanded. Therefore the vnion or mixture of our religion with the popish religion, is but a dreame of vnwise Politickes: for in this mixture, we must yeeld, and they must yeeld something: but we may not yeeld a iot of the truth reuealed to vs. There is no fellowship of light with darkenesse. 1. Cor. 6. Colacinthus a naughtie pot hearbe, marred a whole pot of pottage. 2. King. 4. 40. Christ saith in the like case of the Pharisies; Let them alone: they are the blinde leaders of the blind, Math. 15. 14. We may yeeld in things indifferent, but not in points of religion. In matters of this world, we may be indifferent, and of neither side: but in matters of God, we may not. There is no halting betweene two religions.

The second point is, they gaue not place by way of subiection. The reason is, the Apostles were of highest authoritie, Luk. 10. 16. simply to be beleeued in their doctrine. And they had extraordinarie authoritie, to punish them that rebelliously withstood them. Act. 5. 5. & 10. & Act. 13. 20. 2. Cor. 10. 6. For this cause, they were not to stand subiect to the iudgement, and censure of any man. They willingly suffered their doctrine to be tried; yet were they not bound to subiection, as other ministers of the new testament are, 1. Cor. 14. 32. 1. Ioh. 4. 1. It may be said, if they would not giue place by subiection, howe then gaue they place? Answer. There is two kinds of yeelding: one by tolleration without approbation, the other by subiection, which is the greatest approbation that can be. By the first, it may be, Paul was content to giue place, but not by the second. Here we see, howe we are to yeeld, to the corruptions of the times, in which we liue, whether they be in manners, or in doctrine. We are to giue place by meeke and patient bearing of that which we cannot mende, but we are not to giue place by subiection.

The third point is, the ende of Pauls refusall, That the truth of the Gospell might continue: that is, that the Gospel might be preserued in puritie, and integritie in all things. And by this Paul giues vs to vnderstand, that if circumcision be made a necessarie cause of iustification, and saluation, the truth of the Gospel doeth not continue. Here let vs obserue, that when iustification, or saluation is ascribed to workes, or Sacraments, the truth of the Gospell giues place, and falshood comes in the roome. Wherefore the religion of the Church of Rome, is a meere deprauation of the Gospel, for it makes workes to be the meritorious causes of iustification, & saluation. Nay, which is more, it teacheth men to worship a peece of bread, and to invocate dead men, and to kneele downe to stockes, and stones.

6 And of them that seemed to be great I learned nothing, or, I was not taught.—:(what they were in times past, it makes no matter to me: God accepteth no mans person:) for they that are the cheife, did not communicate any thing to me.

Here Paul laies downe the second signe of his approbation, namely, that in conference, he learned nothing of the cheife Apostles. And this he expresseth in the first words: in which, the concealement which he vseth, is to be obserued. For hauing begun a sentence, he breakes it off in the middle, and conceales the latter part, and leaues it to be supplied by the reader thus, Of them that seemed to be great, I was not taught, or, I learned nothing. The like forme of speaking, is vsed 1. Chron. 4. 10. Where Iabez saith, If the Lord blesse me and be with me; concealing the end of his sentence, I will be thankefull, thus, and thus.

In the roome of this concealement, Paul puts an answer to an obiection. For some man might take exception, against his former speech, thus: Thou callest the Apostles Great, but thou speakest fainedly: for thou knowest, they were but poore fishermen. To this he makes answer thus: What they were once, it makes no matter to me. Then he renders a reason of his answer: God accepts no mans person. This done, he proceeds, and renders a reason of his first speech: he learned nothing of the cheefe Apostles: because, they did not communicate any thing to him, either in doctrine or counsell.

The vse. This verse serues to expound other places in S. Iohn. Where Christ promiseth to giue his spirit to his Disciples, to teach them all things, Ioh. 14. 26. and to led them into all truth, Ioh. 16. 13. Now these promises directly, and properly, concerne the Apostles: and they are here verified in Paul. Who was so farre forth taught by God, and lead into all truth, that the cheife Apostles could not teach, or communicate, any thing to him. For all this, though Paul and the rest, were led into all truth, that they could not erre, yet were they not led into all holinesse of life, that they could not sinne. Paul saith, to will is present with me, but he addes, that he cannot doe the good he would. Christ saith to all the Apostles, He that is washed and is all cleane, must still haue his feete washed, Ioh. 13. 10. Wherefore they are to be rebuked, that thinke there must be no want at all in them that are Preachers of the Gospel: and hereupon take occasion to despise their Ministerie, if they can spie any thing amisse in their doings. Vpon the same ground, they might reiect the Ministerie of the Apostles. For though they could not erre in preaching, and writing, and though they had no neede to be taught of any man, yet were they not free from sinne in their liues; and the chiefe of them sundrie times fayled.

Againe, here we learne, that there is a good, and lawfull kind of boasting: and that is, when a man is disgraced, and his disgrace is the dishonour of God, and the disgrace of the Gospel. This makes Paul here to say, that he learned nothing of the chiefe Apostles. For if he had said otherwise, he should haue bin reputed to be no more but an ordinarie disciple: and the doctrine, which he taught before this conference, should haue bin called in question. For this cause, he stands vpon it, that they did not communicate any thing vnto him. Vpon the like occasion he professeth that he will boast, 2. Cor. 11. 16. Here the saying of Salomon may be obiected, Let an other mans mouth praise thee, and not thine owne, Prou. 27. 2. I answer, it sufficeth for the truth of sundrie prouerbs, if they be commonly, ordinarily, and vsually true, though they be not generally true. Thus ordinarily, men are not to praise themselues: yet in a speciall and extraordinarie case, it may be otherwise, And the manner which Paul vseth in commending of himselfe, is to be obserued. First, he doth it in great modestie: because in speaking of himselfe, he concealeth that part of the sentence, which should haue serued to expresse his praise. Secondly, in praising of himselfe, he is not carried with enuie, but his care is, to maintaine the good name of the rest of the Apostles; when he saith, What they haue bin, it is no matter to me. Here then we see, that the Atheists doe Paul wrong, who challenge him for pride, and presumption, as though he could not brooke an equall, and withall skorned to learne of any. Againe, by Pauls example we are to take notice of a common sinne. Mens hearts are so possessed with selfe-loue, and they are so addicted to their owne praise, that it is griefe to them, to heare any praised beside thēselues: whereas loue binds vs as well to take care for the good name of others, as of our owne.

When Paul saith, What they were in times past, it matters not to me: we learne, that we are to esteeme of men, not as they haue bin, but as they are. Peter, Iames, and Iohn, though they had bin fishermen, yet are they honoured of Paul, as Apostles. Therefore when men haue repented, we may not vpbraid thē with their liues past. Neither may we take occasion to contemne them that be in authoritie; because we haue knowne what they haue bin heretofore: but euery man is to be esteemed according to his calling, and according to the grace of God giuen him. Like is Gods mercifull dealing toward vs. For he accepts men, not as they haue bin, but as they are when they repent. Therefore if Sathan shall at any time obiect thy life past: say vnto him thus: Tell me not what I haue bin: but tell me what I am, and what I will be. This sufficeth when we repent.

God accepteth the person of no man] By person is meant, not the substance of a man, or the man himselfe, but the outward qualitie, or condition of man, as countrey, sexe, birth, condition of life, riches, pouertie, nobilitie, wisdome, learning, &c. And God is saide, not to accept the person, because he doth call men, bestow his gifts, and giue iudgement, according to his owne wise and iust pleasure, and not according to the outward appearance, and condition of the person. Read Iob. 34. 19. It may be obiected, that God deales not equally with them that are equall: because all men are equall in Adam, and of them he chooseth some to eternall life, and refuseth others. I answer: he is said to accept persons, that deales vnequally with men, beeing bound to deale equally: now God is not thus bound: because he is a soueraigne, and absolute Lord ouer all his creatures, and may doe with his owne what he will, Math. 20. 16. Secondly, it may be obiected, that God had respect to Abel, and his sacrifice, Gen. 4. 4. Ans. The condition of man is twofold, outward, inward. Outward, standes in worldly, and ciuill respects. Inward, standes in a pure heart, good conscience, and faith vnfained. For this onely was Abel respected, Hebr. 11. 4. Though God accept not the outward person, yet in euery nation he that feareth God, is accepted of him, Act. 10. 34. Thirdly, it may be obiected, that God iudgeth euery man according to his workes. Ans. Though workes appeare outwardly, yet the roote and ground of them, is in the heart. And the iudgement of God is according to them, as they are fruits of the faith of the heart.

The vse. All men are in this to be like vnto God their heauenly father: not accepting persons in their dealings. As Magistrates in the exequution of iustice, Deut. 1. 17. Ministers in teaching, and in the reproouing of sinne, Mark. 12. 14. and all beleeuers, who are not to haue religion in acceptation of persons, Iam. 12. 1. This acceptation is the ruine of societies. And it is the common fault. For vsually elections are made, offices bestowed, and iustice exequuted with partialitie, and with blind respects to countrey, kinred, friendship, money.

Secondly, we are all taught, to feare the iudgement of God, and to prepare our selues with all diligence, that we may be found worthie to stand before God, in that great day. For we must come naked before him, and he will haue no respect to our birth, our riches, our learning. Therefore it is good for vs now to put on Christ, that in him we may be accepted. For with him the father is well pleased.

Thirdly, we may not set our hearts vpon the outward things of this world: because God doth not respect vs for them. But we are earnestly to seeke after the things that make vs accepted with God; as true faith, righteousnes, and good conscience. Rom. 14. 17.

Againe, superiours must be admonished to deale moderately with their inferiours, Coloss. 2. 11. Againe, inferiours are to comfort themselues, if they be oppressed: in that God the iudge of all, accepts no persons.

Lastly, here we learne, that when we shall haue immediate fellowship with God in heauen, all outward respect of persons shall cease. God himselfe, and the lamb Christ Iesus, shall be all in all to the Elect.

In the ende of the verse, Paul addes: for they communicated nothing to me. but to the contrarie Rom. 1. 12. may be obiected. Where Paul desires to come to Rome, that he might be comforted by their mutuall faith both his, and theirs. Answ. Though the Apostles did communicate nothing to Paul in respect of doctrine, or iudgement; yet might they, or the meanest beleeuers, conferre something vnto him, in respect of comfort, or the confirmation of his faith: and thus much he signifieth to the Romanes. Here is a good item for them, that come to no sermons, because they can learne nothing. Put the case they were as learned as the Apostles, yet might they profit in hearing in respect of comfort, of faith, and good affection.

7 But on the contrarie, when they saw that the Gospel ouer the vncircumcision was committed vnto me, as the Gospel ouer the circumcision was to Peter: 8 (For he that was mightie by Peter in the Apostleship ouer the circumcision, was also mightie by me toward the Gentiles.) 9 And when Iames, and Cephas, and Iohn, knew the grace of God that was giuen to me, which are accounted pillars, they gaue to me, and to Barnabas, the right hād of fellowship, that we should preach to the Gentiles, & they vnto the Circumcision.

The wordes of more difficultie, are thus to be explaned. Contrariwise] that is, they did communicate nothing to me in way of correction, but on the contrarie they gaue me the hand of fellowship. Againe, the words [Circumcision, and vncircumcision] signifie the nation of the Iewes, and the Gentiles, the one circūcised, the other vncircūcised. And whē Paul saith, that the grace of God was giuen to him, he meanes specially, the gift of an Apostle. Rom. 1. 5. Lastly, to giue the right hand of fellowshippe to Paul, is to esteeme and acknowledge him, for their collegue, or fellowe Apostle, by giuing the right hand in token thereof.

The contents of the words are these. Here Paul sets downe the third signe of his approbation, namely, that the cheife Apostles acknowledged him for their fellow Apostle, v. 9. Secondly, he sets down the manner, how the cheefe Apostles acknowledged this fellowship: and that was, by making a couenant with Paul, that he should preach to the Gentiles, and Peter to the Iewes. Thirdly, he sets down the impulsiue cause, that mooued the Apostles to receiue Paul to their fellowship: and that was the decree of God, whereby he ordained, that Paul should be the cheife Apostle to the Gentiles, and Peter the cheife Apostle among the Iewes, v. 7. Lastly, he sets down the signes, whereby the Apostles knew, that Paul was ordained the Apostle of the Gentiles: and they are two, the grace of god giuen him, and the power of his Ministerie, among the Gentiles, v. 8, 9. Furthermore, the things here contained, are in a syllogisme disposed, thus: When the Apostles saw that I was ordained the cheife Apostle of the Gentiles, and Peter of the Iewes, they acknowledged me for their fellow Apostle, and made a couenant with me, that I should preach to the Gentiles, and Peter to the Jewes. But when I was with them at Ierusalem, they saw that I was ordained the cheife Apostle of the Gentiles, and Peter of the Iewes.

This minor is omitted, yet the proofe thereof, is set down thus. For they saw the efficacie of my ministerie among the Gentiles, and the grace of God that was with me. Therefore they acknowledged me for their fellow Apostle, &c.

The vse. This text makes notably against the primacie of Peter. First therefore, let vs obserue the Ordinance of God here plainely expressed, that Paul should be the cheife Apostle of the Gentiles, and Peter the cheife Apostle of the Iewes. And this may else where be gathered. For the commission of the twelue Apostles ran thus, that they must first preach to Ierusalem and Iudea, then to Samaria: and in the last place; to the vttermost part of the earth. Act. 1. 8. And Pauls commission was, that he should first preach to the Gentiles, and in the second place to the people of Israel, Act. 9. 16. It may be obiected, that the commission of all the Apostles, was to goe into all the world, and to preach to all men without exception, Mar. 16. 15. Answer. This power and libertie, Christ gaue to all the Apostles, and he did not take it away afterward: neuerthelesse, he ordered it by a second decree, that Paul should specially haue care of the Gentiles, and Peter of the Iewes. And this the Lord did in great wisdome, that confusion and discord might be auoided, and a regard had of all prouinces through the world.

Hence it followes, that the primacie of Peter, ouer Iewes & Gentiles, is a supposed thing. For the ordinance of God, is, that Peter shall be cheife ouer the Iewes, and not ouer the Gentiles, which were almost all the world beside. And thus the supremacie of the Pope goes to the ground, for if he hold of Peter, and succeede him in authoritie, and office, (as he pretends) he must challenge a superioritie ouer the Iewes, and he hath nothing to doe with vs. For Paul was cheife ouer the Gentiles, and not Peter.

Secondly, this Ordinance of God giues vs to vnderstand, that the place, Math. 16. 18. Thou art Peter, and vpon this rocke will I build my Church, &c. and I wil giue thee the keies of the kingdome of heauen: doth not containe a promise made to Peter, of a primacie ouer all the Apostles, and ouer the Catholike church. If Christ had meant any such thing, in these words, he would not haue assigned the Iewes to Peter, and all the nations of the world beside, to Paul. Thus we see, how this text, for many hū dred yeares, hath beene abused, and is still, at this day.

Thirdly, it is false which the Papists teach, that the place in S. Iohn, Feede my lambes, and, feede my sheepe, giues a primacie to Peter, ouer the whole world. For by the ordinance of God, this feeding of lambes, and sheep, is limited to the nation of the Iewes.

Lastly, whereas Eusebius saith in his Chronicle, that Peter was Bishop of Rome, and sate there 25. years, it hath no likelihood of truth: for then Peter liued in the breach of an expresse commandement of God, for a long time: because the Iewes were his speciall charge.

Againe, it is to be obserued in this text, that Iames, Peter, Iohn, are made equall, all being pillars; and Iames is first named: and that not without cause. For not Peter, but Iames was the President of the councell of Ierusalem: because he spake the last, and concluded all, Act. 15. 13. Therefore the first naming of Peter, in other places of scripture, is no sufficient proofe of his supremacie.

Thirdly, Peter here is said to make a couenant with Paul, that he shall be the Apostle of the Gentiles, and Peter of the Iewes. But if Peter had bin head of the Church for 14, yeares togither; and had but known the primacie, which the Papists giue to him, he would not haue consented to this order. It is alleadged, that Paul was the cheife Apostle ouer the Gentiles, in respect of paines and labour, and not in respect of iurisdiction. I answer, this distinction hath no ground in the word of God. Againe, Paul was an Apostle, and vsed his Apostolicall authoritie ouer the Gentiles: and there is no Ecclesiasticall person that is, or can be aboue an Apostle. For he was simply to be beleeued in preaching and writing, and had extraordinarie power giuen him by God, to punish them that rebelled.

Againe, Paul here saith, that the Gospel was committed to him and Peter, that is, that they were put in trust with it. Hence we learne 3. things. The first, that the Gospel is not ours, but gods; and that men are but the keepers of it. For this we are to praise God. The second is, that the ministers of the word, are to keep, and maintaine the truth of it, with all faithfulnesse and good conscience: and further, to apply it to the best vse, and to the greatest good of men. For this charge lies vpon them that are put in trust. The third is, that the Gospel is a speciall treasure. For this, we in England are to giue vnto God all thankfulnes, specially, by bringing forth the fruits of the Gospel. In this dutie the most of vs come short: and therfore we may iustly feare, least God take from vs the gospel of life, and giue it to a nation, that will bring forth the fruit of it.

Moreouer, in that Paul saith, that God was mightie by him, and Peter, to the Iewes and Gentiles, we are to consider the efficacie of the Ministerie. Of it three cautions are to be obserued. The first, that grace or power to regenerate, is not included in the word preached, as vertue to heale, in a medicine: Paul saith, He that planteth, and he that watereth is not any thing, 1. Cor. 3. 7. To regenerate, is the proper worke of God, not agreeing to angels, no not to the flesh of Christ, exalted aboue men and angels. For the vertue to renew or regenerate, is not in it, as in a subiect, but in the godhead of the sonne. The second caution is, that grace is not inseparably annexed, and tyed, to the word preached, for to some it is the sauour of death, to death. The third is, that the preaching of the word is an externall instrument of faith, and regeneration: and the proper effect of it, is to declare, or signifie. And it is an instrument: because, when the ministers of the word, doe by it signifie and declare, what is to be done, and what is the will of God, the spirit of God inwardly inlightens the minde, and inclines the heart to beleeue, and obey. Hence we learne that it is a magicall fiction, to suppose that fiue words, For this is my bodie, should transubstantiate the bread, into the bodie of Christ. Secondly, we learne, that the Sacraments doe not conferre grace, ex opere operato, by the worke done. For the word and Sacraments, are both of one nature (Sacraments beeing a visible word.) Now the word, & the preaching of it, doth not conferre grace, but onely declare what God will conferre. Thirdly, by this it appeares, that charmes or spels, haue not force in them to cure diseases, and to worke wonders, but by satanicall operation. For the best word of all, euen the word preached, hath it not. Lastly, we are here to be put in mind, that we loose no time in hearing of the word; for it is a meanes whereby we are clensed and renewed. Euery branch that bringeth forth fruit, God purgeth it by his word and other meanes, that it may bring forth more fruite, Ioh. 15.

It is a thing to be obserued, that the Apostles at Ierusalem, acknowledged Paul to be an Apostle: because he had the gift of an Apostle, and because his ministerie was powerfull amōg the Gentiles. Therefore, they which haue the gift of teaching, by whome also God is powerfull in the conuersion of sinners, are Ministers certenly called of God. Let them thinke on this, that vtterly condemne the ministerie of the Church of England. For many teachers among vs, can shew both the gift of teaching, and the power, or efficacy of their ministery.

It is worth the marking also, that the Apostles are called Pillars. Here we see, what is the charge of the ministers of the word, namely, to sustaine and to vphold the Church, by doctrine, praier, counsel, good life. Elizeus is called of Ioas, The charrets and horsemen of Israel, 2. King. 13. 4. And the Church of God vpon earth, is called the Pillar and ground of trueth, in respect of the Ministerie of the word. 1. Tim. 3. 15.

Againe, in that all ministers in their places (according to the measure of gifts receiued) are pillars, they are admonished hereby to be constant in the truth, against all enemies whatsoeuer. It is the praise of Iohn the Baptist, that he was not as a reed shaken of the winde, Math. 11. 7. All beleeuers are to stand fast in temptation, against their spirituall enemies, Eph. 6. 13. and this they shall the better doe, if they be directed by the good example of their teachers.

Thirdly, in that Ministers are pillars, we are taught to cleaue vnto them, and their ministerie, at all times, in life and death. For we are liuing stones in the temple of God, Christ is our foundation, and they be pillars to hold vs vp: and therefore not to be forsaken. Deut. 12. 19.

Furthermore, Paul at this time was not accounted a pillar: for he saith thus, Iames, Cephas, Iohn, are accounted pillars; as who should say, I am accounted none. Thus Paul goes through good report, and euill report, and is content to be contemned.

Lastly, the example of concord among the Apostles is to be obserued: in that they giue the right hands of fellowship one to an other.

10 Warning onely that we should remember the poore: which thing also I was diligent to doe.

In these words, Paul sets downe the fourth and last signe of his approbation at Ierusalem, on this manner. At my departing the Apostles warned me to remember the poore, and of no other thing did they giue me warning: therefore there was a full and perfect consent betweene vs.

In the wordes, two things are set downe, the Apostolicall warning, and the practise of it by Paul. The warning in these words, [Warning onely that we should remember the poore.] In them three points are to be considered. The first, that the Church of Ierusalem is in extreame pouertie. And the causes of it may be two. The first, because the poorer sort receiued the Gospel: thus it was in Corinth, 1. Cor. 1, 26. Not many wise according to the flesh, not many mightie, not many noble. The like we in experience at this day: the poorer sort among vs doe more heartily receiue it then they of the richer sort. By this we are taught, that we may not fixe our loue, and our confidence vpon riches: & they that buie, must be as though they bought not, and they that possesse, as though they possessed not. Because riches steale away the heart. The second cause of their pouertie was, that they were depriued of their riches for the profession of the name of Christ. 1. Thess. 2. 14. Heb. 10. 34. Here we are taught to sit downe, and to recken what the profession of Christ will cost vs to the vttermost: and we must put this in our account, that we must be readie, and willing to part with the deerest things in the world, for the name of Christ. And this reckning and resolution must we daily carrie about with vs.

The second point is, Why the Church of Ierusalem must be releeued by the Gentiles, considering by Gods law Deut. 15. 11. euery place must releeue his owne poore. Ans. We are first of all, debters to our owne poore, and they must first be releeued: this done (in the case of extreame necessitie) we are debters to the poore a thousand miles off. And in this case, did the Apostles craue releefe of the Gentiles, for them of Ierusalem.

The third point is, that the Apostles themselues are carefull for the gathering of releefe. Hence we learne, that it is the office of Pastours and teachers, not only to preach and dispence the word, but also to haue care of the poore: and this care is to be shewed in exhortation, counsell, ouersight. As for the administration and execution of matters belonging to the poore, it belongs to others. If the Apostles at any time gathered, carried, and dispensed releefe, it was because the Church was not yet founded, and planted, and therefore there was no other to doe it.

Now I come to the practise of Paul, in these words; Which thing also I was diligent to doe it. Here first let vs marke, that Paul who had spoiled and made hauocke of the Church of Ierusalem, now gathers releefe, (and as we say) begges for it: and, no doubt, the rather that he may make some recompence for the wrong he had done. By his example we are taught to make Satisfaction for all iniuries and hurts done to others, and that to the vttermost. He that steales, according to the qualitie of his theft, must restore either twofold, or fourefold, Exod. 22. 7. he that maimes a man must pay for his healing, and for his resting, that is, for the losse of his labour, Exod. 21. 19. Daniel saith to Nabuchadnezzar, O King, breake off thy sinnes with almes deedes, Dan. 4. 24. that is, whereas thou hast bin giuen to crueltie, and oppression, cease to doe so any more, and make some recompence by giuing of almes. Dauid saith, it is the propertie of a wicked man, to borrow, and not to repay, Psal. 37. 21. Satisfaction, recompence, and restitution, is the way to life by the appointment of God. Ezech. 18. 7. and 33. 15. If thou restore the pledge, and repay that which thou hast robbed, thou shalt liue, and not die. The Lord saith, Are the treasures of wickednes yet in the house of the wicked? and he addes, that he will not iustifie the false ballance, Mich. 6. 10, 11. Zacheus, in his conuersion for known wrongs, restores fourefold: and for his vnknown wrongs he giues halfe his goods to the poore. Luk. 19. 7.

Let vsurers, ingrossers, and all that oppresse, or deale deceitfully, remember this; and begin to make conscience of this du ty of Satisfaction, or restitution. And that it may the better be practised, I will further set downe fiue points.

The first is, who must satisfie and restore? Ans. He that is the cause of any wrong, or losse to others: and all they that are accessarie. Men may be accessarie many waies, by commaundement, by counsell, by consent, by partnership, by receiuing, by silence when a man ought to speake, by not hindring when he ought to hinder, by not manifesting that which we ought to manifest.

The second is, To whom must restitution be made? Ans. To him that is wronged, and beares the losse, (if the partie be knowne and aliue:) if he be dead, to his heires: if all be dead, to the poore. If the person wronged be not knowne to vs (as often it falls out) then restitution is to be made to the Church, or commonwealth, and restitution is to be turned into Almes for the poore. Dan. 4. 24. Moreouer, if both the giuing and the receiuing of a thing be vnlawfull, as in bribes, and Simoniacall gifts; restitution is not to be made to the giuer, but, as before, it is to be applied to common vse, specially to releefe.

The third point is, What must be restored? Ans. The things which are of vsvniustly receiued, or deteined, either known to vs, or vnknowne. If they be knowne, they are in their owne kind to be restored, or in value, Exod. 21. 19. If the partie, who is to restore, be in extreame pouertie, and haue not wherewith to make recompence, he must doe that which he can, that is, he must shew a readie and willing minde: and this is done by confession, and by crauing of pardon. If goods to be restored, be for their value and quātitie vnknowne, then restitution must be made according to the iudgement, and discretion of them that are wise.

The fourth point is, touching the time when? Ans. In respect of preparation of mind, we must presently satisfie: yet not in respect of execution. For the Act of restitution may be deferred, if there be ignorance of the right, or ignorance of the fact, if the restorer be in extreame neede: if vpon present restitution, life, goods, or good name, be indangered.

The last point is, in what order and manner, Restitution is to be made? Ans. Things certen must first be restored, and things vncerten after. Among things certen, that is, which certenly belongs vnto an other, things bought and not deliuered, are to be restored, and Deposita, things committed to our trust. If things to be restored for their value and qualitie be vncerten, the order is this; Restitution must be made (according to the discretion of wise men) in some part: and for the rest, pardon to be craued. Againe, in restitution warines is to be vsed, least by supplying the losses of other men, we make to our selues the losse of good name.

Againe, in Pauls practise we see an earnest care and diligence to prouide for the poore. And his diligence is further expressed Rō. 15. 25, 28. where it is said, that he ministred to the Saints at Ierusalem, and withall that he gaue himselfe no rest in this dutie, till he had sealed this fruit vnto them, that is, till he saw it done according to his desire. His example must be followed of vs. It is not enough for vs to giue good words, and to wish well, but we must in our places and callings, doe our endeauour that releefe may euen be sealed to our poore. And there be many reasons to mooue vs. First, let vs consider that the charge was very great, to maintaine the altar of the Lord in the old Testament with sheepe, and oxen, and offerings of all kinds: and now in the new Testament the poore come in the roome of the Altar. Secondly, the poore represent the person of Christ; and in them he comes vnto vs, and saith, J am hungrie, I am sicke, I am naked, I am harbourlesse: therfore, looke what we would doe to Christ, the same must we doe to them. Thirdly the poore haue title, and interest, to part of our goods: for God is the Lord of them, and we are but stewards to dispose and vse them, according to his appointment. And his will is, that part of our goods be giuen for the releefe of the poore. If this be not done, we are theeues in respect of the goods we possesse. Lastly, mercie or the bowels of compassion in vs, is a pledge, or an impression of the mercie that is in God, towards vs: and by it we may knowe, or feele in our selues, that mercie belongs vnto vs. Thus we see, what is our dutie: nowe let vs consider what is our fault. Not to blame any person or persons, it is our common fault, that we are backeward and slacke in this dutie. And the cause is, that we doe not heartily giue our selues to Christ: and this makes vs to be so slacke in giuing our goods to the poore, 2. Cor. 9. 5. Againe, we commonly liue (as it were) without a law. We doe not with Dauid, set the laws of God before vs, Psal. 119. v. 168. Neither doe we apply our hearts to his statutes, v. 112. For then would we with Dauid, make haste to keepe the commandements of God, v. 60. Specially this great commandement of releefe: and the rather, because the obseruing of it, is the inriching of vs all.

Lastly, let vs marke, that Paul beeing warned of the Apostles, was diligent to doe that, whereof he was warned. The like must we doe. It is not sufficient to heare, but beside this, there must be in vs a care and diligence to doe and practise that which we heare. For this is to build vpon the rocke. And it is a common fault, to heare much, and doe little. Ezech. 33. 24.