Matthew Poole and continuators on Exodus 22:12

12 And if it be stollen from him , he shall make restitution unto the owner thereof.

Heb. from with him, which is an emphatical expression, and notes that this was taken away, either 1. From those things which were with him, or which were his, i. e. from the midst of his own goods, which supposeth fraud in him: Or 2. From under his eye, when he either did know of it, or with common care and diligence might have been known and prevented, and this argues gross neglect in him. And this is one reason, why this man is bound to make restitution, when the other ver, 7. is not; another reason of the difference is, because those things verse 7. were onely or principally dead things and such things as required no great care, or, if they did, for in that case also were included, Oxen▪ Asses, &c. v. 9. yet he with whom they were left received no recompence for them and therefore was not obliged to any singular care about them; but here the things were such as needed great care and diligence, which also this man was obliged to perform by the hire which he received upon that account, which was Iacobs case, Gen. 31. 39.