Matthew Poole and continuators on Joshua 13:21

21 And all the cities of the plain , and all the kingdom of Sihon king of the Amorite, which reigned in Heshbon, whom Moses smote with the princes of Midian , Evi, and Rekem, and Zior, and Hur, and Reba, which were dukes of Sihon , dwelling in the countrey .

Opposed to the foregoing Cities of the Mountain of the Valley.

[illegible: 1+ letters] Synecdochical expression, for a great part of it; in which sense we read of all judea, and all the Region round about Jordan, Mat. 3. 5. and all G[illegible: 1+ letters]lilee, [illegible: 1+ letters]lat. 4. 23. and many others. Or, which all were the Kingdoms of Sihon, i. e. belonged to his Kingdom. The Hebrew conjunction and is oft put for the relative particle which, as Iudg. 2. 21. Prov. 19. 1. Eccles. 6. 12.

Not in the same time or Battel, as appears by comparing Numb. 21. 23, 24. with Numb. 31. 8. but in the same manner. And they are here mentioned, partly because they were slain not long after, and upon the same occasion, even their enmity against Israel; and partly because of their relation and subjection to Sihon, as it here follows.

[illegible: 1+ letters]u. How could they be so, when they were Kings of Midian? Numb. 31. 8. Ans. There were divers petty Kings in those parts, which were subject to greater Kings, and such these were; but are here called Dukes or Princes of Sihon, because they were Subject and Tributaries to him; and therefore did one way or other assist Sihon in this War, though they were not killed at this time. It is probable, that when Sihon destroyed those Moabites which dwelt in these parts, he frighted the rest of them, and with them their Neighbours and Confederates, the Midianites, into some kind of Homage or Tribute, which they were willing to pay to him.

Heb. inhabiting that Land, namely Midian, last mentioned; whereby he signifies, that though they were subject to Sihon, yet they did not dwell in his Land, but in another.

Marginal references: Numb. 31. 8.